![]() |
|||||
|
|
DFC letter to Represenative Coble
August 4, 1997 The
Honorable Howard Coble Dear Mr. Chairman: We have read with concern your July 29 statement accompanying introduction of H.R. 2281, the WIPO Copyright and Performances and Phonograms Treaty Implementation Act of 1997. Of particular note is the sentence at the bottom of the second page which reads: " This bill presents a reasonable compromise which achieves these goals and reflects agreement among the traditional content and software communities as well as many of the leading American members of the consumer electronic and computer industries and user interests." The undersigned represent many of the leading American members of the consumer electronic and computer industries and user interests. We regret to inform you that you have been misinformed regarding our views on H.R. 2281, which we strongly oppose in its present form because it is contrary to our long-held and oft-stated positions. As is evident from the attached correspondence, we have made our positions clear in recent written and oral comments on this subject to the Patent and Trademark Office, to the Department of Commerce, to the White House, and in congressional testimony last year. For the record, we reiterate that we remain willing to pursue a compromise with the "traditional content and software communities" but, in fact, such agreement has neither been reached nor is reflected in H.R. 2281. We appreciate the opportunity to clarify our positions and look forward to working with you on the complex issues involved in updating the Copyright Act for the digital era. Sincerely Adam
Eisgrau Peter
M.C. Choy Gary
Shapiro Ruth
Rodgers Edward
Black Barbara
Simons ATTACHMENTS: American
Library Association Letter to Andrew Pincus, General Counsel, Department
of Commerce - 6/5/97
|
||||
|
This site is operated by the Digital Future Coalition (DFC). IF you have trouble with this site, please contact dfc@dfc.org
|
|||||